Adele Waugaman is Senior Director of the United Nations Foundation and Vodafone Foundation Technology Partnership, which is dedicated to leveraging the power of technology to support and strengthen global health and humanitarian work. The opinions expressed are her own.
It’s no secret that technology is reshaping the business world, radically altering established industries like the news media, music and movies.
But there has been comparatively little analysis of how advances in technology are transforming humanitarian aid, particularly in the field of disaster response.
Today there are over 5 billion mobile subscriptions in use, and cell phones are enabling connectivity in places where previously we only talked of a digital divide.
In tandem dynamic new networks have sprung up, changing the way we interact online. Facebook offers a good example. With over half a billion members, if Facebook were a country, it would be the world’s third most populous nation.
These tools, and improved access to these tools, are enabling a new culture of community driven communications that is challenging and changing the nature of disaster response.
After the 2010 earthquake in Haiti, survivors sent pleas for help via text message, and concerned citizens around the world plugged in to help out. They used cloud-, crowd-, and SMS-based technologies to gather, translate, geolocate, and publish information about urgent humanitarian needs.
In other words, individuals outside of the humanitarian system were becoming important sources of information about the emergency response.
Yet without a direct interface to the humanitarian system, these emerging ‘volunteer and technical communities’ can end up producing data without the assurance that it can be acted upon by aid workers.
To bridge this gap, the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), together with the United Nations Foundation and Vodafone Foundation Technology Partnership, commissioned a report to examine how technology is reshaping the information landscape in which aid groups respond to sudden onset emergencies.
The report, Disaster Relief 2.0: The Future of Information Sharing in Humanitarian Emergencies, analyzes how humanitarian and technology groups worked together in Haiti and makes recommendations for strengthening this collaboration in future emergencies.
Launched today at the Dubai International Humanitarian Aid and Development Conference, the report gets to the heart of many of the hard questions we must ask to effectively embrace the opportunity that advances in communications technologies present for emergency response.
Questions like:
• How can we make the response of largely volunteer-based technology groups more consistent and reliable, so that aid groups can count on information from these groups in all emergencies, not just the ones that consistently grab news headlines?
• What models can we create to support innovation and collaboration between the formal humanitarian system and the largely grassroots-driven volunteer technical community?
This report, which is available for download at the U.N. Foundation<http://www.unfoundation.org/disaster-report> website, is intended to be a springboard for discussion.
A number of individuals whose work is profiled in the report also are contributing to this conversation through a blog series that is open to comment and will run for several days on the U.N. Dispatch<http://www.undispatch.com/> blog.
In the nearly fifteen months since the earthquake in Haiti, collaboration between aid and technology groups has intensified. Earlier this month www.LibyaCrisisMap.net<http://www.libyacrisismap.net/> went live—the first extensive mash-up of U.N. humanitarian information crowdsourced through individuals registered with volunteer and technical communities.
If the rapid advances in these recent months are any indication, then the path ahead will be paved by this dynamic new collaboration. The Disaster Relief 2.0 report proposes a potential way forward, but where we go will depend too on your say. Add your voice to the discussion.
Read more...