Maintenance. We are currently updating the site. Please check back shortly

Thomson Reuters Foundation

Inform - Connect - Empower

China tells officials training should not involve tourism

Source: Reuters - Fri, 3 Jan 2014 10:33 GMT
Author: Reuters
cor-gov hum-war
Tweet Recommend Google + LinkedIn Email Print
Leave us a comment

BEIJING, Jan 3 (Reuters) - China has banned officials of the ruling Communist Party from spending public funds on tourism under the guise of taking training classes, the Finance Ministry said on Friday, the latest measure in the fight against corruption.

The measure requires officials to clearly list expenses to "close entertainment and tourism loopholes" and bans the booking of "upscale hotel suites".

A further provision bans the "distribution of extra toiletries", without explanation, a likely reference to officials stocking up on hotel amenities.

The rules are the first to apply to domestic training programmes lasting less than three months, the statement said.

Newspapers frequently report on cases of government officials making spurious trips on the public purse, ostensibly for work, when in reality many go on holiday or engage in shopping sprees abroad.

Over last year's week-long national holiday in October, officials in eastern Jiangsu province were allegedly caught spending time at rural bed-and-breakfasts on the public dime, according to state media.

Since taking over the reins of the government last March, President Xi Jinping has vowed to crack down on corruption, which he has said threatens the Communist Party's survival.

The government has gone after everything from bribery and gift-giving to lavish banquets as it seeks to assuage public anger at widespread graft and the extravagant behaviour of some officials. (Reporting By Adam Rose; Editing by Ron Popeski)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of the Thomson Reuters Foundation. For more information see our Acceptable Use Policy.

comments powered by Disqus