Maintenance. We are currently updating the site. Please check back shortly
Members login
  • TrustLaw
  • Members Portal
Subscribe

Italian mayors want guarantees on Syrian chemical transfer

Source: Reuters - Fri, 17 Jan 2014 01:00 PM
Author: Reuters
hum-war
Tweet Recommend Google + LinkedIn Bookmark Email Print
Leave us a comment

ROME, Jan 17 (Reuters) - Mayors of Italian towns near the port designated as a transit site for Syria's chemical arsenal said on Friday they would protest at the decision unless they were guaranteed maximum security against any environmental or health risk.

"We want to make sure safety measures are at the maximum level and we want the government to better inform us so we can reassure our residents. If we are not better informed, then there will be protests," said Rosarno Mayor Elisabetta Tripodi.

The chemicals are being sent to Italy under an accord brokered by Russia and the United States after poison gas attacks in Syria's civil war in August that killed hundreds of people. The nerve gas agents are to be later destroyed at sea.

The Italian government has chosen Gioia Tauro, the country's biggest container port located in the southern region of Calabria, to move 560 tonnes of Syria's "priority A" chemicals from a Danish ship to an American one.

Mayor Domenico Madaferri of San Ferdinando, the town closest to Gioia Tauro, initially threatened to block the facility while others mayors appeared more flexible. "I'm realistic. I know we cannot block the port whose operations are very important for the local economy," Tripodi told Reuters.

Transport Minister Maurizio Lupi and Foreign Minister Emma Bonino have both said regional fears are unfounded, noting that around 30,000 tonnes of equally dangerous chemicals passed through the port without incident last year.

"It's only right to involve the mayors, the local administrators and the region," Lupi said on Friday. "Together we can better guarantee safety."

Ahmet Uzumcu, head of the world's chemical weapons watchdog, has said the entire operation would take no more than 48 hours and that the chemicals would not be stored at the port but only transferred from one ship to another. (Reporting by Steve Scherer; Editing by Mark Heinrich)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of the Thomson Reuters Foundation. For more information see our Acceptable Use Policy.

comments powered by Disqus
TOPICAL CONTENT
Topical content
LATEST SLIDESHOW

Latest slideshow

See allSee all
FEATURED JOBS
Featured jobs