Maintenance. We are currently updating the site. Please check back shortly

Thomson Reuters Foundation

Inform - Connect - Empower

Bird lovers, space buffs square off over new Florida launch pad

Source: Reuters - Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:22 GMT
Author: Reuters
hum-nat
Tweet Recommend Google + LinkedIn Email Print
Leave us a comment

By Irene Klotz

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla., Feb 11 (Reuters) - Florida's plan to build a commercial space launch complex in a federal wildlife refuge surrounding the Kennedy Space Center is drawing fire from environmentalists even before its first public vetting this week.

Advocates say the proposed spaceport is needed to retain and grow Florida's aerospace industry, which lost about 8,000 NASA and civilian jobs after the shutdown of the space shuttle program in 2011.

Opponents of the plan to carve out about 200 acres from the 140,000-acre Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge cite issues about protecting the refuge's plants, water, seashore and wildlife, but say that is not all.

Advocates point to blueprints for new commercial spaceports in Texas, Georgia and other states that will operate under the more business-minded Federal Aviation Administration, rather than as a guest of NASA or the U.S. military, which run Kennedy Space Center and the adjacent Cape Canaveral Air Force Station primarily in support of their own missions.

"When NASA is again aggressively launching to the moon or Mars or asteroids or wherever we end up going, I don't see them standing down to allow commercial activity to proceed unimpeded," said Dale Ketcham, a strategist with the Space Florida economic development agency that is spearheading the proposed Shiloh Launch Complex.

The site on the Merritt Island refuge that the state wants to carve out for a commercial space launch complex would house one or two launch pads, processing hangars and support facilities, which would be built with private funds.

Prospective tenants include Blue Origin, a startup rocket company owned by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, and privately owned Space Exploration Technologies, which is owned by technology entrepreneur Elon Musk and which already flies its Falcon 9 rockets from leased Air Force launch pads in Florida and California.

The first of two public hearings on the project are being hosted by the FAA on Tuesday in New Smyrna Beach and Wednesday in Titusville.

The environmental assessment and related studies are expected to take about 18 months.

Opponents cite environment threats, saying the project would upset the habitat of the Florida scrub-jay and more than a dozen other endangered and threatened species. They also worry over the public's loss of access to the wildlife site.

Charles Lee, with Audubon Florida environmental advocacy group, says rocket launches from Shiloh, a former citrus community located north of Kennedy Space Center, would force the state to shut down public access to the refuge for safety reasons far more often than Space Florida claims

"At best they don't know. If they do know, they're not being candid with the public," Lee said.

The refuge drew nearly 1.2 million visitors and generated more than $60 million in economic benefits in 2012, a recently released study by the U.S. Department of the Interior shows.

An ongoing assessment by the FAA will guide decisions about where to locate roads and how to best minimize the impact of the spaceport on boating, fishing and other recreation.

"Some areas may be off-limits for six to 15 hours per launch," Space Florida wrote in a statement posted on its website.

"We anticipate people will still be able to fish much of the lagoon and watch from the beach during a launch, but the (environmental impact statement) will make that determination," Space Florida said. (Editing by Leslie Adler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of the Thomson Reuters Foundation. For more information see our Acceptable Use Policy.

comments powered by Disqus