Maintenance. We are currently updating the site. Please check back shortly

Thomson Reuters Foundation

Inform - Connect - Empower

Money fails to flow into seed treaty's benefits fund

Source: SciDev - Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:36 GMT
hum-hun hum-aid fod-con fod-env cli-sec cli-ada
Seeds are applied on a biodegradable tape at a university in Ribeirao Preto, Brazil, Jan. 7, 2014. Brazilian agronomist Mateus Marrafon created a prototype biodegradable tape which holds seeds for planting, and features fixed spacing of seeds for growth. The tape disintegrates after being planted in the soil. REUTERS/Paulo Whitaker
Tweet Recommend Google + LinkedIn Email Print
Leave us a comment

Any views expressed in this article are those of the author and not of Thomson Reuters Foundation.

A shortfall in funding is threatening the future of an international treaty on sharing benefits from plant genetic resources, known as the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA).

The treaty was established in 2004 to improve access to genetic resources of 64 key crops for food and agriculture, and to equitably share the commercial benefits arising from their use.

But the 131 countries that have ratified the ITPGRFA are not meeting the target set out in the 2009-2014 strategic plan for implementing the benefit-sharing fund, and the money expected from the private sector has also not arrived.
 
The goal was to get US$116 million into the fund by the end of 2014, but so far just US$21.5m has materialised.

The working group set up to explore innovative ways to secure funding for the treaty met in May in Switzerland, but there was no new agreement on how to plug the gap. Instead participants agreed to study further approaches and present these at a meeting at the end of the year.
 
The fund was to have been financed largely by governments’ contributions — up to 85 per cent of the costs — with the rest coming from companies using seeds.
 
But only eight governments (Australia, Germany, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Norway, Spain and Switzerland, plus the European Commission) have contributed, according to a background document for the May meeting. Some major agricultural countries, such as the United States, China and Argentina are yet to ratify the treaty. The expected industry contributions also failed to appear.
 
“There are no indications that the situation is likely to change substantially by the end of the current strategic plan period, that is, by December 2014,” the document adds.
 
For many participants in the first meeting, this low contribution reflects a lack of confidence in the treaty.
 
The US$21.5m raised includes a Norwegian contribution of US$648,178 between 2009 and 2014, derived from an initiative that provides 0.1 per cent of the value of seed sales in the country. Norway’s government estimates that if all developed countries followed its example, some US$200 million would be collected over ten years.
 
Edward Hammond, a research associate with the Third World Network, a global forum of international organisations and individuals, who participated in the meeting as civil society observer, tells SciDev.Net that the imperative is to fix the provisions for sharing of benefits first.
 
He warns that if benefit-sharing does not occur, the principles of the treaty are not being honored, and it will fall into irrelevance.
 
Hammond says there are other pressing issues, with private industry pushing to expand the number of plants encompassed by the treaty for their own benefit.
 
“The treaty's benefit-sharing fund must operate to benefit small farmers conserving diversity, and not be influenced by seed industry interests. Seed companies cannot reasonably expect to get more seeds out of the system before they start paying for benefit-sharing,” Hammond adds.

The treaty’s co-chairs did not respond to requests for a comment on this article.

Link to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture
 
Link to the Funding Strategy for the Implementation of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture
 
Link to background document of the first meeting of the working group

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of the Thomson Reuters Foundation. For more information see our Acceptable Use Policy.

comments powered by Disqus