Thomson Reuters Foundation

Inform - Connect - Empower

Catholic Church Evades Sex Charges in South Dakota

Womens eNews - Fri, 8 Apr 2011 18:45 GMT
Author: Womens eNews
Tweet Recommend Google + LinkedIn Email Print
Leave us a comment

Any views expressed in this article are those of the author and not of Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Recent State Law Applied In dismissing the 18 cases, the South Dakota judge applied a 2010 state law that limits victims' ability to bring childhood-sexual-abuse lawsuits after age 40. Since almost all Native American boarding-school survivors are older than that, another of their attorneys, Gregory A. Yates of Rapid City, S.D., and Los Angeles, has charged that both the law and the unusual retroactive ruling (applying a new statute to pre-existing cases) target this group. On that basis, Yates asked the court to reconsider its decision, but on April 1 the judge refused to do so. The Sioux Falls diocese did not return calls requesting a comment. Attorney Steven Smith, of Chamberlain, S.D., wrote the 2010 law, which was sponsored by his local representative as a "constituent bill." He testified to the legislature that overaggressive plaintiffs' lawyers were driving the Native American complaints and that the Catholic Church had difficulty responding to them because the alleged activities occurred so long ago. Smith, whose client, Congregation of Priests of the Sacred Heart, is the defendant in about a dozen pending cases for sexual abuse that allegedly occurred at St. Joseph's Indian School, also in Chamberlain, told Women's eNews that under the old law, "plaintiffs were entitled to their day in court and that's a hard one to defend." He added that plaintiffs were "trying to grab the brass ring, seeing others grab the brass ring, thinking it's your ticket out of squalor." "You bet the South Dakota legislation was designed to keep Native American lawsuits out of the courts," said Joelle Casteix, the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests' western regional director. "The Church has a hard time defending itself because it has the proof. It keeps a paper trail on sexual-abuse complaints." These documents are inevitably damaging when they are revealed during litigation, she said. But the plaintiffs' legal efforts continue, according to attorney John C. Manly, of Manly and Stewart. "We will appeal the decision to the South Dakota Supreme Court. We will pursue every remedy," he said. Drum and other plaintiffs have also not given up. "The truth never changes," she said, "and the truth will come out." Would you like to Comment but not sure how? Visit our help page at Would you like to Send Along a Link of This Story? Stephanie Woodard writes on human rights, food and agriculture for magazines and for her blog at For more information: "Soul Wound: The Legacy of Native American Schools," Amnesty International USA: "Native Americans in South Dakota: An Erosion of Confidence in the Justice System," South Dakota Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights:

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of the Thomson Reuters Foundation. For more information see our Acceptable Use Policy.

comments powered by Disqus
Most Popular

Latest slideshow

See allSee all
Featured jobs