Thomson Reuters Foundation

Inform - Connect - Empower

Japan likely to increase defence spending due to isles row - media

Source: Thomson Reuters Foundation - Sat, 5 Jan 2013 04:50 GMT
Author: Reuters
Tweet Recommend Google + LinkedIn Email Print
Leave us a comment

TOKYO, Jan 5 (Reuters) - Japan's government is likely to increase defence spending for the first time in 11 years, Japanese media reported on Saturday, as newly elected Prime Minister Shinzo Abe pledges a sterner response to a territorial dispute with China.

The government is considering increasing defence spending by around 2 percent to more than 4.7 trillion yen (${esc.dollar}53.4 billion) in the fiscal year starting in April, the Mainichi newspaper reported. It gave no source for its information.

The extra spending would be used to increase personnel in the ground self-defence forces and upgrade equipment for land, air and maritime forces, the Asahi newspaper also reported on Saturday. It also did not cite any sources.

Japan's Defence Ministry has scrambled F-15 fighter jets several times in recent weeks to intercept Chinese marine surveillance planes approaching the disputed islands near Taiwan. The islands are known as Senkaku in Japanese and the Diaoyu in Chinese.

The Japanese government administers the islands and purchased three of them from a private owner last September, sparking violent anti-Japanese protests across China. Beijing also claims the isles as part of Chinese territory.

There is a renewed focus on whether relations between China and Japan will improve after voters swept Abe's conservative Liberal Democratic Party back into power last month after three years in opposition.

Abe has repeatedly said there is no room for negotiation on the islands and has said he would boost defence spending to counter China's growing military clout. (${esc.dollar}1 = 88.0400 Japanese yen) (Reporting by Stanley White; Editing by Paul Tait)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of the Thomson Reuters Foundation. For more information see our Acceptable Use Policy.

comments powered by Disqus