Maintenance. We are currently updating the site. Please check back shortly
Members login
  • TrustLaw
  • Members Portal
Subscribe Donate

Philippines: Three months on and communities affected by Typhoon Bopha continue to struggle

Source: ECHO - Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:02 GMT
Author: echo-echo
cli-wea hum-war
EU/ECHO
Tweet Recommend Google + LinkedIn Email Print
Leave us a comment

Any views expressed in this article are those of the author and not of Thomson Reuters Foundation.

In a desolate valley full of rubble, rocks and black sand stands a 2m x 8 meter concrete slab with the names of over 200 people who died when Typhoon Bopha hit Philippine’s southern province of Mindanao. This lone concrete monument bears testimony to the destructive power of the typhoon and the millions of lives which were affected by this disaster.

Two months following the storm ECHO experts Joelle Goire  and Arlynn Aquino, visited the affected areas in Mindanao to monitor the humanitarian aid  projects funded with €3 million by the EU shortly after the storm hit. It also allowed them to take stock of the future needs. What they saw shocked even a seasoned aid worker like Joelle: “I cam here shortly after the disaster and even two months later the extent of the damage to people’s lives such as housing, livelihoods and medical care is hard to describe” she explains. “In addition, since the typhoon, the people have had to endure unseasonably strong rains which have caused further suffering and made delivery of assistance all the more difficult.”

The typhoon’s humanitarian impact was indeed tremendous with 6.2 million people being affected.  Nearly a million people were displaced outside evacuation centres and 1,146 reported dead and 834 are still counted as missing.  Nearly a quarter of a million homes were either destroyed or damaged. Typhoon Bopha has been categorised the deadliest storm in the world in 2012.

In Compostella Valley, the ECHO team had to walk for miles to reach villages which used to sit next to a small river but which turned into a raging torrent during the storm. The entire valley is now littered with dried mud, rocks and debris washed down from the mountains.

In another area, Davao Oriental, the team visited the village of Baganga where hundreds of villagers are still living in tents provided by the Phillipine Red Cross, one of ECHO’s main partner in the on-going relief effort.  The Red Cross is also providing clean drinking water.

In another town, Cateel, the British NGO “Merlin” is using EU funds to provide primary health care to hundreds of families from a bamboo and tarpaulin shelter. It hopes to rehabilitate the building of the health centre as soon as possible in order to provide better care. These are some of the projects which are currently being funded by ECHO and other donors, and government departments.

But the destruction of people’s homes and  livelihoods will be more difficult to achieve without further assistance of the coming months. Major response gaps remain for basic humanitarian needs such as food access, shelter and health services. “These were very poor communities even before the storm hit “, Joelle explains. “Now that the banana and coconut plantations were levelled they have no income so they cannot rebuild their homes on their own and they have little income for basics such as food, clothes and medicines.”  The figures issued by the UN are indeed staggering:  An estimated 750,000 people are in need of shelter support; 400,000 people critically needing sustained food assistance; 1.1M people including 163,000 children have only sub-optimal PHC services; 95,600 people are at risk of malnutrition.

The revised UN Bopha/Pablo Action Plan published on 25 January calls for US$76 million in funding for basic humanitarian assistance and basic rehabilitation. These figures indicate how destructive this storm was and how long it will take for these impoverished communities to recover.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of the Thomson Reuters Foundation. For more information see our Acceptable Use Policy.

comments powered by Disqus