Maintenance. We are currently updating the site. Please check back shortly
Members login
  • TrustLaw
  • Members Portal
Subscribe Donate

Russia's Putin fires top general amid corruption scandal

Source: Thomson Reuters Foundation - Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:28 GMT
Author: Reuters
cor-gov hum-war
Reuters
Tweet Recommend Google + LinkedIn Email Print
Leave us a comment

MOSCOW, Nov 9 (Reuters) - President Vladimir Putin dismissed the chief of staff of Russia's armed forces on Friday in a reshuffle of the military top brass, three days after sacking his defence minister following a corruption scandal.

Putin removed General Nikolai Makarov as his top general and replaced him with General Valery Gerasimov, the commander of Russia's forces in the central military district who has served in the turbulent Chechnya region.

The shakeup at the top of the armed forces of a country that is a nuclear power and permanent member of the United Nations Security Council followed rapidly after the abrupt dismissal of Defence Minister Anatoly Serdyukov on Tuesday.

The changes made clear that the new defence minister, Sergei Shoigu, was immediately making his mark on the ministry. Putin said Gerasimov was Shoigu's choice.

"I think that the minister has picked a suitable candidate and I hope that you will work hard and efficiently," Putin said at a meeting with Shoigu and Gerasimov.

Serdyukov was replaced following the launch of an investigation into corruption at a Defence Ministry company. He had made many enemies in the world of politics and the military as he carried out reforms to modernise the armed forces.

Gerasimov has been deputy chief of the general staff since 2010 and is a veteran of the Soviet and Russian armies.

Gerasimov was also appointed first deputy defence minister in a decree signed by Putin.

Separately, Putin named Arkady Bakhin as another first deputy defence minister, relieving him of his position as commander of Russia's forces in its western military district.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of the Thomson Reuters Foundation. For more information see our Acceptable Use Policy.

comments powered by Disqus