Maintenance. We are currently updating the site. Please check back shortly
Members login
  • TrustLaw
  • Members Portal
Subscribe

Study finds why Roche's Avastin only works in some patients

Source: Thomson Reuters Foundation - Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:00 PM
Author: Reuters
Tweet Recommend Google + LinkedIn Bookmark Email Print
Leave us a comment

* Researchers say half of patients in study had no benefit

* Key question is how regulatory authorities will respond

* Avastin had 2011 sales of ${esc.dollar}6 billion

By Kate Kelland

LONDON, Oct 23 (Reuters) - Genetic testing could help doctors find the small number of patients with advanced bowel cancer likely to benefit from cancer drug Avastin, scientists said on Tuesday.

In a study of Roche's blockbuster drug, which targets and blocks a protein called VEGF-A, researchers found that different forms of the protein lead to varying responses and Avastin had no benefit in at least half of those taking it.

Avastin, or bevacizumab, has been shown to increase survival from bowel cancer in around 10 to 15 percent of patients and was licensed on that basis, but until now it has been impossible to predict who is likely to benefit.

"This is the only evidence so far that shows which patients will respond to Avastin - or more importantly those who will not respond to Avastin - in the conditions for which it was originally licensed," said David Bates, a professor at Britain's University of Bristol, who led the research.

"We've shown which half of patients don't benefit, so that takes half the patients out of the treatment group," he told Reuters. "But it's also quite possible that it's only a fraction of the other half that do benefit."

Sales of Avastin, which brought in ${esc.dollar}6 billion for Roche in 2011, have been hit by a decision last year by U.S. drugs regulators to revoke its approval in breast cancer after it decided the drug was not effective enough to justify its risks.

Although Avastin is licenced in Europe for advanced bowel or colorectal cancer, it is not used within Britain's taxpayer-funded National Health Service (NHS) because the health costs watchdog NICE says its benefits to an unknown minority of patients do not justify its costs.

DIFFERENT FORMS

For this study, Bates' team looked at two different forms of the VEGF protein - one called VEGF165 which helps cancers to grow new blood vessels to get food and oxygen from the blood, and another called VEGF165b which has the opposite effect and acts as a brake on this growth.

Analysing data from 97 samples from patients in a final stage clinical trial of Avastin, they found that those with low levels of VEGF165b survived three months longer without their cancer progressing compared with patients not treated with Avastin.

But patients with higher levels of VEGF165B saw no benefit from Avastin and survived no longer than those not taking it.

A spokesman for Roche, which is the world's largest maker of cancer drugs, said the findings had limitations because they were based on a relatively small number of patients and were retrospective.

"Validation (of these findings) requires a prospective study with an adequate (or) much larger sample size," the spokesman said in an emailed statement.

Bates, whose work was published in the journal Clinical Cancer Research, said the key question now was how regulatory authorities respond.

"They could say we need further clinical trials, or they could say we now need to start screening for VEGF165b to determine whether patients should get (Avastin) treatment," he said in a telephone interview.

Bowel cancer is the third most common cancer in Britain with around 41,000 people diagnosed each year. In the United States, an estimated 143,460 people will be diagnosed with this form of cancer in 2012, according to the National Institutes of Health.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of the Thomson Reuters Foundation. For more information see our Acceptable Use Policy.

comments powered by Disqus
LATEST SLIDESHOW

Latest slideshow

See allSee all
FEATURED JOBS
Featured jobs