Maintenance. We are currently updating the site. Please check back shortly
Members login
  • TrustLaw
  • Members Portal
Subscribe

Venezuela: Supreme Court Disregards Rights in Election Case

Source: Human Rights Watch - Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:34 PM
Author: Human Rights Watch
Tweet Recommend Google + LinkedIn Bookmark Email Print
Leave us a comment

Any views expressed in this article are those of the author and not of Thomson Reuters Foundation.

The Venezuelan Supreme Court's decision on October 17, 2011, to disregard a binding decision by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of an opposition politician is a blow to the rule of law. The Venezuelan Supreme Court's decision on October 17, 2011, to disregard a binding decision by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of an opposition politician is a blow to the rule of law, Human Rights Watch said today. The case involved Leopoldo López, a former Caracas district mayor and a potential presidential candidate. He has been barred from seeking elected office by the country's comptroller general since 2008 due to corruption allegations. But he has never been formally charged, prosecuted, or convicted. "The Venezuelan Supreme Court today basically belongs to President Chávez," said José Miguel Vivanco, Americas director at Human Rights Watch.  "Ever since his supporters packed the court in 2004, its rulings have repeatedly sought to protect the president's political agenda, not to uphold basic human rights." On September 1, based on a challenge by López, the Inter-American Court ruled that Venezuela must allow him to run for office. But the Supreme Court ruled that the Inter-American Court's decision was "not executable." The Supreme Court said that international norms must not contradict Venezuela's constitution nor violate the country's sovereignty, and that carrying out the ruling would run counter to the government's international obligations to fight corruption. The court ruling ignores that Venezuela voluntarily undertook binding legal obligations when it became a party to the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights. Venezuela - and the Chavez government - is obliged not only to implement the provisions of the Convention in good faith, but is prohibited from invoking any provision of domestic law as a reason to refuse or fail to meet its obligations. In a news conference, the Supreme Court president, Luisa Estella Morales, said that López could still run for office, but that she could not comment on whether he would be able to take office if elected. President Hugo Chávez and his supporters have effectively neutralized the independence of Venezuela's judiciary, Human Rights Watch said. In the absence of a judicial check on its actions, the Chávez government has systematically undermined basic human rights.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of the Thomson Reuters Foundation. For more information see our Acceptable Use Policy.

comments powered by Disqus
LATEST SLIDESHOW

Latest slideshow

See allSee all
FEATURED JOBS
Featured jobs