Thomson Reuters Foundation

Inform - Connect - Empower

Women with low literacy suffer more than men-study

Source: Thomson Reuters Foundation - Wed, 8 Feb 2012 23:11 GMT
Tweet Recommend Google + LinkedIn Email Print
Leave us a comment

BOSTON, Feb 8 (Reuters) - Women with low literacy suffer disproportionately more than men, encountering more difficulties in finding a well-paying job and being twice as likely to end up in the group of lowest wage earners, a study released on Wednesday said. 

   Analysis by the Institute for Women's Policy Research, or  IWPR, found women at all levels of literacy tended to earn less than men, but the wage gap between genders was the most striking at the lowest literacy levels. Low literacy was defined in the study as basic or below-basic level of skill. 

   Women with low literacy were twice as likely as men at the same skill level to be among the lowest earners, bringing in $300 a week or less, the report said. 

   "Because women start off so low in terms of wages, having higher literacy and more skills really makes a big difference," said Kevin Miller, a senior research associate at IWPR and co-author of the study. 

   Women need to go further in their training and education levels to earn the same as men, Miller said. 

   The analysis was based on National Assessment of Adult Literacy surveys from 2003, the most recent data available, and focused on reading skills, not writing and numeric literacy. The data was collected from a nationally representative sample of 19,714 people aged 16 and older, living in households or prisons. 

   Data showed about one-third of American adults had low literacy levels, and more than 36 percent of men and 33 percent of women fell into that category, the institute said. 

 (Reporting By Lauren Keiper; Editing by Daniel Trotta and Peter Cooney) 

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of the Thomson Reuters Foundation. For more information see our Acceptable Use Policy.

comments powered by Disqus