The law is increasingly being weaponised around the world to silence public interest reporting. While some cases brought against journalists are legitimate, many are not. Some cases, known as Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation suits (SLAPPs), are deliberately brought to silence or intimidate journalists. The fear of retaliation or costly lawsuits may discourage publication or cause a journalist to remove a story. This has the effect of chilling speech and may undermine public discourse, often on matters of public interest.
This guide has been published in response to this context, with a focus on European jurisdictions. It aims to assist journalists working in Europe to minimise their legal liability by providing a checklist of factors to consider before publishing a story. While this may not prevent SLAPP suits or other legal attacks on journalists, this Guide seeks to assist journalists in:
- acting ethically,
- limiting their legal liability, and
- ensuring that they may raise a reasonable defence before a court to avoid unfair legal sanctions.
Download report
Details
Languages
EnglishRussianBelarusianRelated resources
View allBefore you publish: A journalist’s guide to safer reporting
This guide provides journalists with a…
Read MoreThe value of pro bono for media: InSight Crime
InSight Crime is an award-winning non-profit newsroom that seeks to…
Read MoreThe value of pro bono: Radio Domus
Radio Domus FM is a non-profit youth-centric, 24-hour community radio station in Kajiado…
Read MoreWeaponising the Law: Attacks on Media Freedom
This report uniquely draws on the contributions of media freedom…
Read More