Jack Graham is Context’s Deputy Editor for Funded Projects, leading our global reporting on the just energy transition, nature and biodiversity, and artificial intelligence. Context is the Foundation’s media platform, providing news and analysis on climate change, the effects of technology on society, and socio-economic inequality.
The annual COP climate summit is a unique event to cover as a journalist. Hunting for interviews, you have tens of thousands of people all in one place: politicians, climate experts, activists and negotiators from nearly 200 countries. Surrounded by so many new contacts and stories, you’re faced with endless split decisions on where to spend a short supply of time.
CO29 in Azerbaijan was a crucial moment for the world to agree an ambitious finance goal to help developing countries. In the hottest year on record, delegates were under intense pressure as they scuttled around Baku’s state-of-the-art Olympic Stadium. Its packed rooms and corridors only made that pressure feel more intense.
When I first arrived, I wanted to find out about the elephant in the room: Donald Trump. His political comeback in the United States cast a shadow over COP29. Who better to ask than President Biden’s climate advisor Ali Zaidi, and Catherine McKenna – Canada’s environment minister during Trump’s first term. They told me the shift will inevitably weaken the U.S. role but, as McKenna said: “no one country can stop progress on this”.
Whether or not the U.S. election made a difference, hopes for a breakthrough deal were low – despite the need for developing nations being so high. My colleague Bhasker Tripathi sat down with a Pakistani minister Syed Murad Ali Shah who is dealing with overwhelming damages after the major floods in 2022. We experienced a mood that was subdued in Baku, as distrust rankled between countries. Ultimately, the global target agreed of $300 billion per year by 2035 falls well short of the more than $1 trillion required.
That’s not to say nothing fruitful came out of COP29. A deal was agreed on rules for carbon markets, the loss and damage fund is getting moving, and the impact of critical mineral mining on vulnerable communities was put on the map. Meanwhile, potential solutions are everywhere. I spoke to Bezos Earth Fund CEO Andrew Steer about how AI could protect nature, and joined panels on boosting the solar energy supply chain and changing the conversation around food.
But people are losing faith in the ability of COPs to save the planet. Climate multilateralism is fraying at the seams. Can next year’s COP30 – being hosted in the Brazilian Amazon in Belém – turn the ship around?
To stay up to date with our climate news:
You can also follow our work on LinkedIn, Instagram and Twitter/X.
More news
View AllConstitutional protections are not enough to defend press freedom: what our research in South Africa shows
South Africa’s constitutional protections for press freedom are among the strongest on the…
Read MoreNew report reveals the extent of EU AI Act influence
Our research on 3,000 companies shows the EU AI Act is…
Read MoreWhat compliance with the EU AI Act actually looks like
Five things every Compliance expert needs to consider…
Read MoreCivil society is being cut off and locked down at the same time
From Georgia to Venezuela, civil…
Read MoreWhat’s driving pro bono growth in Europe?
As demand for pro bono legal support surges across Europe, the Global Pro Bono…
Read MoreWhy a free press is the world’s best defence against impunity
Press freedom decline drives…
Read MoreWhen regulators, investors and industry sit down together: Our Brussels roundtable on AI governance
A candid conversation about responsible AI – and how far most companies still have to…
Read MoreIntroducing the Openly newsletter: Global LGBTQ+ news, straight to your inbox
Since 2018,…
Read MoreNew report collates evidence on value of journalism for growth and security
The Thomson…
Read More2026 World Cup: Using football’s global reach to advance human rights
With the 2026 FIFA…
Read More